Comprehensive nonprofit and foundation information is a search away

By registering or logging in, you get access to detailed profiles and personalized dashboard.

Trends & Issues

Centering communities: Leaning into participatory grantmaking to increase equity 

Learn why the Boston foundation embraces participatory grantmaking and how they’ve implemented best practices and shifted power to drive greater impact in their community.

July 02, 2024 By Candace Burton

Two days after COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic, the Boston Foundation set up a special fund to provide rapid-response support to local nonprofits serving communities disproportionately affected by the outbreak. We streamlined the application process, eliminated the written reporting requirement, and, 18 days later, awarded the first round of grants in Greater Boston. The first 15 grantees supported communities of color, immigrants, seniors, children, and the homeless, among others. Over 10 weeks, we distributed 181 grants totaling $4.5 million, relying on nonprofit leaders closest to the community for guidance. The success proved we could shift our grantmaking strategy quickly and find new ways to help our community. 

Based on what we learned from the pandemic, in 2023, we started the Safety Net Grants program, which supports social service providers responding to the essential needs of marginalized communities and vulnerable residents. With COVID-19 funding from the CARES Act and the Paycheck Protection Program running out, inflation at the highest levels in four decades, and fuel costs rising, we had to help fill in the gaps in the safety net system. And we knew it was important to include those closest to the community in the process.  

Why we opted for participatory grantmaking 

Safety Net Grants uses participatory grantmaking—the practice of centering affected communities by giving them the power to decide which organizations to fund. We believe organizations led by individuals who mirror the demographic makeup and experiences of their communities are the most impactful. So, we prioritize uplifting traditionally marginalized groups, especially BIPOC-led (Black, Indigenous, and people of color) organizations with 1) a stated mission and/or programs to serve predominantly BIPOC communities; and 2) an executive director or senior leadership, at least 51% of the board of directors, and/or at least 51% of the staff and volunteers identifying as BIPOC.  

Our community reviewers—primarily BIPOC nonprofit leaders, past and present grantees, and volunteers—receive stipends to acknowledgment their critical contributions and play a pivotal role in ensuring our processes are transparent and inclusive.  

In the initial prescreening round of our grant selection process, reviewers evaluate organizations’ alignment with our priorities and filter out approximately 50% of applicants. In the full review round, each application is examined by a primary and a secondary reviewer, who bring their top applications to a review team meeting. This process is repeated across three full review meetings, ensuring a cooperative decision-making process. 

Participatory grantmaking as part of trust-based philanthropy 

Participatory grantmaking is just the beginning. Our Safety Net Grants program marries this approach with the principles of trust-based philanthropy to create a comprehensive strategy that addresses traditional power imbalances in funding relationships.  

Here’s how we put our principles into action: 

Multi-year, unrestricted funding: Safety Net Grants feature an open application process, offering two-year grants of $50,000 in general operating support. 

Simplified paperwork: Our application form is designed for efficiency so it can be completed in under nine hours by 80% of grantseekers. For reporting requirements, we’ve shifted from written reports to conversational reporting and opt for attending scheduled events over site visits to reduce the strain on grantees. 

Transparency and responsiveness: We ensure clarity about our funding by hosting annual information sessions and offering office hours before application deadlines. 

Feedback-driven improvement: Following each grant cycle, we distribute an anonymous applicant survey and hold feedback discussions with unsuccessful candidates. Embracing a philosophy of continuous improvement, we value and act upon the feedback we receive. 

Support beyond funding: In collaboration with Resilia, we offer an online platform that includes courses, templates, personalized nonprofit coaching, and peer learning to enhance organizational capacity. 

Our efforts to engage community members in the grant decision-making process underscores our commitment to trust-based principles that prioritize fair power sharing, transparency, and feedback. 

Generating positive impact 

Participatory grantmaking has changed the way we work, making us more engaged with the community. We’ve been able to build trust with community members as they see us take recommendations and feedback seriously. Instead of just the foundation making decisions, it’s a beautiful, collaborative effort. 

Through participatory grantmaking, we can include diversity in our decision making and invest in groups that haven’t received funding before. In every round, we learn about new organizations and community members doing deep, impactful work. Our approach is grounded in humility and in recognizing that true expertise lies with those on the front lines. As a community foundation, we can’t be impactful if we don’t show deep respect for the knowledge and experience of the communities we serve. 

Photo credit: Jovanmandic via Getty Images

About the authors

Candace Burton

Candace Burton

she/her

Program Officer, Boston Foundation

View bio

Continue reading

View all insights